Rinchen Khandu 12 Science

 My backstory.  ( My biography)

I'm a guy well known to every body as Rinchen khandu who  came from a one of the remote village situated on northern part of Bhutan called Lunana. This guy  was introduced to this world on 15th July 2004 by my mom Dorji Pelmo and dad Tshering dorji. Till now I am been raised and bought up by my uncle Tashi Namgay from the age of 6 itself. From the day I was born i was given not proper care by mother and i was taken care by my granny and uncle. I was enrolled as a student and admitted in our community school when I was six.  I studied there till class two  Staying in my own village and studying there has great memories and joy. But when i was in class 2, we fifteen of us was listed and enrolled as Gyelpoi tozey student. After that we came to Thimphu in the cold and very harsh weather crossing the tragic snow capped mountains. I was seven that time and crossing those mountains which are above 6000m to 7000m was one of the hardest moments in my life. After fighting with the cold blizzards and harsh climate along the cold terrains for 5 days finally we reached to our destination. 

Myself and 14 of us from my village were placed and admitted in of of the schools in Thimphu dzongkhag that is Genekha Lower secondary school. When I think back to my times at GLSS , a flood of vivid memories rushes in. Of course, Those days was not without its challenges. I vividly recall the butterflies in my stomach before a class presentation, the frustration of struggling with difficult math problems, and the occasional conflicts with classmates. These moments, though challenging at the time, taught me valuable lessons in perseverance, empathy, and the importance of friendship. Being far flung from my village and i haven't get much chance to meet my parents during my school day. Sometimes during mid term break and holidays also me and my brother doesn't have any place to go and our melancholic face is left in the school, waving our hands to those of our friends who goes with overloaded smile on their face with their parents. The memories of playing mar balls and bottle caps never fades from my mind. Moreover those bad memories too, like having tough time to do laundry and not able to resist the cold to take shower.  Combating all those obstacles, after few years i was graduated from from Genekha with all those unforgettable times of good and bad.

 After graduating from Genekha, I came here at Wangbama CS. I studied here from class VIII. It was again the hatest season of the people of Bama, winter... As being opposite to one of the highest mountain Dagala, winter is little cold here so most people hates. We students being always lucky and need to return to school in this harsh season. Studied here from class VIII to X and I had to drop out when I reach class XI due to some issues. After dropping for one whole year, I repeated in XI with a glimpse of hope and took science stream. It was very hard and tough moment for me to study after not touching the book for 365 days. But with determination and aspirations from my teachers and friends I tried my level best. After trying my level best my result was little colorful at the end. 

The Drinking Age Ought to Be Raised (argumentative )

In social orders over the globe, the lawful drinking age shifts. Within the Joined together States, it stands at 21, but is this age restrain viable? This paper fights that the drinking age ought to be raised to 25 for a few reasons.

Firstly, brain advancement proceeds into the mid-20s. Ponders have appeared that the human brain, especially the prefrontal cortex mindful for decision-making and drive control, isn't completely created until around age 25. Expending liquor some time recently this arrange can disturb this improvement, driving to long-term results such as disabled judgment and cognitive work.

Besides, raising the drinking age can decrease the probability of alcohol-related mischances and fatalities among youthful individuals. Inquire about shows that higher drinking ages are related with lower rates of inebriated driving and alcohol-related occurrences. By constraining access to alcohol for people beneath 25, we are able possibly spare lives and anticipate irreversible hurt.

In addition, deferring the legitimate drinking age can prevent early start of liquor utilize. Youthful individuals are frequently more vulnerable to peer weight and experimentation. By raising the drinking age, we make a social standard that debilitates underage drinking and empowers capable behavior.

Faultfinders may contend that raising the drinking age encroaches on individual freedoms. However, this contention ignores the broader societal benefits of such a approach. Fair as society sets age confinements on driving and voting to ensure people and keep up arrange, raising the drinking age may be a degree pointed at advancing open health and security.

Besides, actualizing the next drinking age can address the social normalization of liquor utilization among youthful individuals. In numerous social orders, liquor is profoundly imbued in social exercises and celebrations. By raising the drinking age, we challenge this social standard and energize more advantageous options for socializing and recreation.

In conclusion, raising the drinking age to 25 may be a sensible policy measure with significant potential benefits. By adjusting the legitim palate drinking age with the age of full brain improvement, ready to relieve the dangers related with early liquor utilization. Furthermore, this approach can decrease alcohol-related hurt, hinder underage drinking, and advance a culture of obligation and balance. It's time to rethink our approach to liquor direction and prioritize the well-being of youthful individuals and society as a entire.

Poem.. 

Trust. 

Within the calm chambers of the heart's space,

Believe weaves its fragile, undetectable chain.

A bond implicit, however significantly felt,

In its grasp, all questions liquefy.

It's the whisper within the wind's delicate murmur,

The enduring look underneath the sky.

In each word, in each deed,

Believe plants its respectable seed.

Through trials profound and whirlwinds wild,

Trust stands faithful, undefiled.

It's the reference point within the darkest night,

Directing souls towards the light.

However delicate as a delicate glass,

Believe smashes when deceived, too bad.

It takes but a minute to break its hold,

And in its nonattendance, hearts develop cold.

So cherish it, sustain it with care,

For believe could be a treasure past compare.

In its grasp, adore finds its way,

And hearts join together within the light of day. 

Should teachers be held accountable if students come in conflict with the law?(BHSEC2022)

Holding Teachers Accountable for Students’ Law Conflicts.

In recent times, there has been a growing debate over whether teachers should be held accountable if their students come into conflict with the law. While some argue that teachers play a crucial role in shaping students' behavior and should thus bear responsibility, others contend that the actions of students are influenced by various factors beyond the control of teachers. This essay explores both sides of the argument and proposes a balanced perspective on this contentious issue.

One compelling argument in favor of holding teachers accountable is that they serve as significant influencers in students' lives. Teachers not only impart academic knowledge but also play a pivotal role in shaping students' character, values, and behavior. They spend a considerable amount of time with students, often serving as role models and mentors. Therefore, they should be held responsible for instilling positive values and behaviors in their students, including respect for the law.

Moreover, teachers are entrusted with the duty to create a safe and conducive learning environment for students. If students engage in illegal activities, it reflects a failure on the part of teachers to adequately fulfill this responsibility. Holding teachers accountable can serve as a deterrent, incentivizing them to be more vigilant in identifying and addressing behavioral issues among their students.

On the other hand, it is unfair to hold teachers solely responsible for students' actions outside the classroom. Students are influenced by various factors, including family upbringing, peer pressure, socioeconomic status, and community environment. Teachers have limited control over these external influences and cannot be held accountable for every decision made by their students.

Furthermore, attributing students' law conflicts solely to teacher negligence oversimplifies the complex nature of human behavior. Students are autonomous individuals with their own agency and decision-making abilities. Imposing accountability on teachers for students' actions may lead to a culture of blame-shifting and detract from addressing underlying societal issues contributing to youth delinquency.

To strike a balance, it is essential to recognize the shared responsibility among various stakeholders in nurturing responsible citizens. While teachers play a crucial role in shaping students' behavior, they cannot be held solely accountable for students' actions outside the classroom. Instead, a holistic approach involving collaboration between teachers, parents, law enforcement, and community organizations is necessary to address the multifaceted factors influencing student behavior.

Rather than punitive measures, efforts should focus on providing teachers with adequate training and resources to support students' socio-emotional development and address behavioral issues proactively. Additionally, promoting parental involvement and community engagement can create a supportive ecosystem that fosters positive youth development and reduces the likelihood of students engaging in unlawful activities.

In conclusion, the question of whether teachers should be held accountable for students' law conflicts is complex and multifaceted. While teachers undoubtedly play a significant role in shaping students' behavior, attributing sole responsibility to them is unreasonable and ineffective. A balanced approach that acknowledges the shared responsibility among various stakeholders is essential in promoting a safe and conducive learning environment while addressing the underlying factors contributing to youth delinquency.

Photography.

In the quiet of the morning light,                                                                                                            I grab my camera, feeling right.                                                                                                    Wandering through the fields so green,                                                                                                Capturing moments, a simple scene.                                                                                                    

The world looks different through my lens,                                                                                            A butterfly, a tree that bends.                                                                                                                   Each click, a memory to keep,                                                                                                                A secret view, a hidden peep.

Sunsets paint the sky so bright,                                                                                                             The stars come out to kiss the night.                                                                                                       A child's laughter, a bird in flight,                                                                                                          All frozen in my frame, just right.                                                                                                            

Photography's my way to see,                                                                                                                  Photography's my way to see,                                                                                                                With each snap, I find my joy,                                                                                                                A simple hobby, my favorite toy. 

Essay

The Importance of Encouraging Bhutanese Youth to Stay at Home: Fostering Responsibility and Independence.

 

Bhutan, a country known for its unique Gross National Happiness index, places a high value on the well-being and development of its citizens. One question that arises is whether Bhutanese youth should be encouraged to leave their homes at the age of 18 to foster responsibility and independence.  However, it is argued that encouraging youth to stay at home can deprive them of an independent life, supportive environment for their growth and development, and do not encourage them to be financially self-reliant individuals. Since I do not agree with this view, I will present a rational rebuttal against the idea of pushing Bhutanese youth to leave their homes

 

One common concern is that Bhutanese youth may struggle to develop independence if they remain at home. However, it is important to recognize that independence is not solely dependent on physical separation from the home environment. Independence can be nurtured through various means, such as encouraging youth to take on responsibilities within the or engaging in community activities. By actively involving youth in decision-making processes, they can develop crucial life household skills while still benefiting from the support and guidance of their families.

Another argument against Bhutanese youth staying at home is that they may have limited exposure to the real world. However, this perspective overlooks the potential for diverse experiences within their own communities. Bhutan is a country with rich cultural traditions and a strong sense of community. By encouraging youth to explore their own cultural heritage, engage with local organizations, and participate in community service initiatives, they can gain a deeper understanding of the real world while remaining rooted in their own cultural identity.

Critics suggest that Bhutanese youth who remain at home may be delayed in achieving financial independence. However, financial independence is a multifaceted concept that extends beyond leaving home at a specific age. Rather than pushing youth into unfamiliar environments prematurely, families can provide guidance and support in developing financial literacy and skills. This can be achieved through discussions about money management, savings, and encouraging part-time employment opportunities. By empowering youth with financial knowledge, they can make informed decisions about their future while benefiting from a stable foundation.

Encouraging Bhutanese youth to stay at home beyond the age of 18 can provide numerous advantages in their personal growth and development. The concerns raised about the lack of independence, limited exposure to the real world, and delayed financial independence can be effectively addressed within the supportive family and community structures that Bhutanese society offers. The youth have to be given platform in decision-making processes, exposing them to diverse experiences within their communities, and providing guidance in financial matters. Thus, Bhutan can foster responsible and independent individuals who are equipped to contribute positively to their society. It is through this balance of support and encouragement that Bhutanese youth can truly thrive

Parents should not interfere in their children’s career choices. (BHSEC,2020)

Parents should not interfere in their children’s career choices

 

The question of parental involvement in their children's career choices is a contentious one. While parents often have the best intentions at heart, interfering in their children's career decisions can have negative consequences. In this essay, we will explore the reasons why parents should not interfere in their children's career choices. By allowing children the freedom to explore their own interests and make independent decisions, they can gain valuable experiences and develop the necessary skills to succeed in their chosen path.

 

One compelling argument against parental interference in career choices is the importance of personal growth and self-discovery. Each individual has unique talents, passions, and aspirations. By allowing children the freedom to explore different career options, they can discover their true interests and aptitudes. Through this process, they gain a better understanding of their strengths and weaknesses, enabling them to make informed decisions about their future. Parental interference may limit the child's exploration and hinder their ability to develop a sense of self-identity and purpose. Some may argue that parents have more life experience and can provide valuable guidance in career choices. They may argue that children lack the necessary knowledge and foresight to make informed decisions. While parental guidance is essential, it is crucial to strike a balance between providing advice and allowing children to make their own choices. By giving children the freedom to explore their interests, parents can support them in their journey towards self-discovery.

 

Another crucial aspect to consider is the development of resilience and responsibility. When children are allowed to make their own career choices, they learn to take ownership of their decisions and face the consequences, whether positive or negative. This process builds resilience and helps them develop problem-solving skills, adaptability, and perseverance. Shielding children from failure by dictating their career choices deprives them of these valuable life lessons, which are essential for personal and professional growth. Opponents may argue that parents have a duty to protect their children from making mistakes that could have long-lasting consequences. However, it is important to distinguish between major life-altering decisions and minor setbacks. Parents can still provide emotional support and guidance without imposing their own aspirations on their children. Allowing children to navigate their own career path does not mean abandoning them; rather, it empowers them to become self-reliant individuals.

 

One of the primary reasons children should have autonomy in career choices is the pursuit of passion and personal fulfillment. When individuals are passionate about their work, they are more likely to be motivated, dedicated, and successful in their chosen field. By imposing their own desires on their children, parents may inadvertently push them into careers that do not align with their interests, resulting in dissatisfaction and unhappiness. Allowing children to follow their passion ensures that they have a higher chance of finding fulfillment and leading fulfilling lives. Detractors may argue that practical considerations, such as financial stability, should outweigh personal passion. While financial stability is undoubtedly important, it should not be the sole determining factor in career decisions. Parents can encourage their children to explore ways of aligning their passions with practicality, rather than dictating their choices outright. By offering support and guidance, parents can help children strike a balance between their passions and practical considerations.

 In conclusion, parents should refrain from interfering in their children's career choices. By doing so, children are given the opportunity to grow personally, discover their true interests, and develop important life skills. They learn resilience and responsibility and are more likely to find fulfillment in their chosen path. While parental guidance is essential, it should be offered in a supportive manner, respecting the autonomy of the child. Ultimately, by allowing children to make their own career decisions, parents empower them to lead successful and fulfilling lives.

Students studying in boarding schools are more independent and self-sufficient than the ones studying in day schools.

Becoming Independent and Self-Reliant

 

Boarding schools are known for helping students become independent and self-sufficient. Some people say that day schools can also nurture independence, but it's clear that the unique living arrangements and immersive experiences in boarding schools offer special chances for personal growth. In this essay, we will look at why students in boarding schools tend to be more independent and self-sufficient than those in day schools.

 

Some people argue that day schools can also teach independence by offering extracurricular activities and personal development opportunities. But we need to consider the big difference between boarding schools and day schools. Living on campus, away from home and family, makes students adapt and take responsibility for their daily routines, like managing schedules and doing chores. This self-reliance fosters independence as students learn to make decisions and manage time effectively.

 

Another argument is that day schools can teach independence by letting students have after-school jobs or volunteer work. These activities can definitely help personal growth, but they often happen separately from academics. In boarding schools, though, the whole community works together, encouraging students to be involved in different aspects of school life. They can join student-run clubs and take on leadership roles in student governments. By doing this, boarding school students gain practical experience in working together, being responsible, and solving problems, which helps them become independent and self-sufficient.

 

Some people might say that boarding schools have strict rules that hinder students' independence. But they miss the point behind these rules. Boarding schools provide a structured environment where students can thrive and learn to manage their lives effectively. By setting clear expectations and guidelines, boarding schools create a supportive yet disciplined atmosphere that helps students develop self-discipline, organizational skills, and a sense of personal responsibility.

 

Day schools offer valuable chances for personal growth, but the unique living arrangements and immersive experiences in boarding schools make them especially effective in fostering independence and self-sufficiency among students. The immersive environment allows students to develop important life skills, adaptability, and the ability to make independent decisions. By actively participating in a community that supports personal growth and teaches responsibility, boarding school students gain an advantage in becoming independent and self-sufficient individuals. Therefore, boarding schools are an ideal choice for students seeking a comprehensive education that nurtures independence and self-sufficiency.